Positivism contends that knowledge is acquired through collection and processing of objective facts that must be further subjected to analysis. Verstehen tradition contends that understanding the intentionality of actors is very important in gaining knowledge in social sciences. Constructivism contends that Reality is shaped due to inter-subjective meaning attached to events by relevant actors and institutions. Constructivism adopts middle path between Individualism and Holism. Identity is given lot of importance in the Constructivist Approach. Morality refers to the basic principles and values that play great role in defining the permissible limits allowed to members of given society. It helps in self conception of a group and is a great stabilising force. Law refers to the regulation of activities supported by a strong sanctioning authority. Law often supports the notions of Morality, though there may be a variance between the two notions. Identity is subjected to flux and notions of morality change with impact of social, economic and technological forces. Law is also modified to ensure smooth change in basic norms governing an identity. The impact of Religious Fundamentalism is very important in orthodox societies as many religious leaders support old values and laws even in the context of tremendously changed time.
Cite this article:
Tripuresh Pathak. Constructivist Understanding of Interaction between Law and Morality in Identity Formation. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2023;14(1)11-6. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2023.00003
Tripuresh Pathak. Constructivist Understanding of Interaction between Law and Morality in Identity Formation. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2023;14(1)11-6. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2023.00003 Available on: https://rjhssonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2023-14-1-3
1. Adler, Emanuel. (1997) ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations, (03), (03), Pp.319-363. http://rochelleterman.com/ir/sites/default/files/adler%201997.pdf Accessed on 12/11/2022.
2. Friedmann, Wolfgang. (1972) Law in a Changing Society, Second Edition. London: Stevens & Sons.
3. Fuller, Lon, L. (1964) The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
4. Gann, Patrick. (2017) ‘An Explication and Application of Max Weber’s Theoretical Construct of Verstehen’, Journal of Social Work, Values and Ethics, (14), (02), Pp.30-34. https://jswve.org/download/fall_2017_vol._14_no._2/30-Max-Webers-Verstehen-2017-14-2.pdf Accessed on 12/11/2022.
5. Hart, H.L.A. (1963) Law, Liberty and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Pakistan Constitution (Second Amendment) Act, 1974. https://www.pakistani.org/pakistan/constitution/amendments/2amendment.html Assessed on 12/11/2022.
7. Pathak, Tripuresh (2017) ‘Constructivism in the Era of Technological Singularity’, Indian Journal of Society & Politics, (04), (03), Pp.43-48. https://www.ijsp.in/admin/mvc/upload/40307_CONSTRUCTIVISM%20IN%20THE%20ERA%20OF%20TECHNOLOGICAL.pdf Accessed on 12/11/2022.
8. Scheller Jr., Arthur. (1952-53) ‘Law and Morality’, Marquette Law Review, (36), (03), Pp.319-327. https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3196&context=mulr Accessed on 12/11/2022.
9. Wendt, Alexander. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Zehfuss, Maja. (2004) Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.