ABSTRACT:
The connection of culture and personality are interwoven a wide research has been done in it and researchers are learning new trend from previous research works as well. The role of culture in shaping up an individual’s personality deals under the dimension of idiocentrism and allocentrism. The present study investigates the relationship between individualism- collectivism and idiocentrism and allocentrism among the group and individual in terms of behaviour and personality. The paper talks about the entrenched dogma that persists in the perspectives of independent individual sustaining in the group of collectivism. Again, research need to be done overcoming the structure, streamlining the moral aspect of surviving with nuclear family, the psychological impact on growing generation. The inheritance of empathy and sympathy along with the understanding of an individual the shifting of such things due to factors like chain of slavery, up rootedness, migration, hegemony of west over east and many more reasons still needs to explored adhering trauma one has to go through and suddenly the globalization has shrunk the world , the culture are invited to mingle with food habits, language, dressing, technology and innovation resulting in the formation of a hybrid personality that still beseeching for its identity.
Cite this article:
H. Rupali Singh. Coherent Concept of Idiocentrism - Allocentrism in Cultural Traits of Persuasive Communication: An Study through Literary Prospective. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2024;15(4):313-7. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2024.00049
Cite(Electronic):
H. Rupali Singh. Coherent Concept of Idiocentrism - Allocentrism in Cultural Traits of Persuasive Communication: An Study through Literary Prospective. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2024;15(4):313-7. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2024.00049 Available on: https://rjhssonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2024-15-4-11
REFERENCES:
1. Iliste, Adrian. The personality dimension of idiocentrism-allocentrism among international students. 2017.
2. Aaker, j. L. (2000). Accessibility or diagnosticity disentangling the influence of culture on persuasion
3. Processes and attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 26,340-357.
4. Aaker, J. L., and Maheswaran, D. The effect of cultural orientation on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research. 1997; 24; 315-328.
5. W. H. Freeman and Company. Bochner, S., and Hesketh, B. Power distance, individualism/ collectivism, and job-related attitudes in a culturally diverse work group. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 1994; 25(2): 233-258.
6. Bond, M. H., and smith, P. B. Culture and conformity: a meta-analysis of studies using asch’s line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin. 1996; 119: 111-137.
7. Chaiken, S., Wood, W., and Eagly, A. H. Principles of persuasion. In e. T. Higgens, and a. W. Kruglanski (eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles 1996: 702-742.
8. The Guilford Press Publications Inc., New York. Chebat, J.C., and Laroche, M. Affect and memory in advertising: an empirical study of the compensatory processes. Journal of Social Psychology. 1995; 135(4): 425-438.
9. Cohen, a. R. Attitude change and social influence. Basic books inc. Eagly, A. H. Uneven progress: social psychology and the study of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992; 63: 693-710.
10. Triandis, Harry C. Individualism‐collectivism and Personality. Journal of Personality. 2001; 69(6): 907–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696169.
11. Hsu, Chia-Fang (Sandy). Acculturation and communication traits: a study of cross-cultural adaptation among chinese in america. Communication Monographs. 2010; 77(3): 414–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.499367.
12. Richmond, Virginia P., James C. Mccroskey, Linda L. Mccroskey, and Joan M. Fayer. Communication traits in first and second languages: puerto rico. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research. 2008; 37(2): 65-73. Https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750802533331.