Author(s): Anshul Pandey, Ramsiya Charmkar

Email(s): Email ID Not Available

DOI: 10.52711/2321-5828.2025.00051   

Address: Anshul Pandey1, Ramsiya Charmkar2 1Research Scholar, Political Science, Rabindranath Tagore University, Raisen M.P.
2Associate Professor, Political Science, Humanities and Liberal Arts, Rabindranath Tagore University, Raisen M.P.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 16,      Issue - 4,     Year - 2025


ABSTRACT:
In an era marked by political disillusionment, economic inequality, and institutional fatigue, social entrepreneurs are increasingly stepping into the realm of political leadership, reshaping traditional paradigms of governance and public service. This research explores the transformative role of social entrepreneurs who transition into political leadership and how their hybrid identities influence civic engagement, participatory democracy, and state-society relations. Rather than being confined to the nonprofit or private sectors, many social entrepreneurs are using their experience in driving systemic social change to enter formal political systems, campaigning on platforms of innovation, transparency, and inclusivity. This study contends that such actors represent a unique fusion of civic idealism and pragmatic governance, offering alternative leadership models that challenge established political norms. Through a multidisciplinary lens, combining insights from political science, sociology, development studies, and public administration, this research investigates the theoretical and empirical implications of this shift. It examines the motivations, strategies, and impacts of social entrepreneurs who have assumed or aspire to assume political office. Drawing on case studies from our country, the study maps the trajectories of prominent individuals whose civic ventures evolved into political platforms, from municipal politics to national leadership. Examples include mayors, parliamentarians, and presidential candidates who have redefined political engagement by embedding principles of social entrepreneurship—such as innovation, scalability, impact assessment, and cross-sector collaboration—into governance. This research ultimately argues for a reconceptualization of political leadership through the lens of social entrepreneurship. It offers a framework for analyzing how hybrid leadership can catalyze democratic renewal and proposes normative principles for institutionalizing such models without undermining democratic integrity. As the global political landscape grapples with legitimacy crises and civic disengagement, the rise of social entrepreneur-politicians offers valuable insights into how alternative leadership pathways can bridge the divide between citizens and the state, foster inclusive development, and reinvigorate the public sphere.


Cite this article:
Anshul Pandey, Ramsiya Charmkar. Social Entrepreneurs as Political Leaders: Redefining Civic Engagement and State-Society Relations. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2025;16(4):313-6. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2025.00051

Cite(Electronic):
Anshul Pandey, Ramsiya Charmkar. Social Entrepreneurs as Political Leaders: Redefining Civic Engagement and State-Society Relations. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2025;16(4):313-6. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2025.00051   Available on: https://rjhssonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2025-16-4-11


REFERENCES:
1.    Alvord, S. H., Brown, D. L., and Letts, C. W. (2004). Social Entrepreneurship and Societal Transformation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science.
2.    Bornstein, D., and Davis, S. (2010). Social Entrepreneurship: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.
3.    Chatterjee, P. (2004). The Politics of the Governed. Columbia University Press.
4.    Dees, J. G. (1998). The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. Stanford University.
5.    Fowler, A. (2000). Civil Society, NGDOs and Social Development: Changing the Rules of the Game. UNRISD Discussion Paper.
6.    Khilnani, S. (2012). The Idea of India. Penguin.
7.    Nicholls, A. (Ed.). (2006). Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change. Oxford University Press.
8.    Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster.

Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): Sanjay Kumar

DOI: 10.5958/2321-5828.2019.00119.0         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Praveen Rai, Sujata

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Balaji Deekshitulu P V

DOI: 10.5958/2321-5828.2020.00055.8         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Rima Bhattacharya

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Sowjanya S. Shetty M, V. Basil Hans

DOI: 10.5958/2321-5828.2019.00162.1         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Gowhar Ahmad Dar

DOI: 10.52711/2321-5828.2023.00015         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Shamsher Singh, Ravish Rana

DOI: 10.5958/2321-5828.2019.00067.6         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): J. B. Anna Asheervadham Mary, Sujeevan Kumar Bullard

DOI: 10.5958/2321-5828.2018.00045.1         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Gedam Kamalakar, Kandi Kamala

DOI: 10.52711/2321-5828.2024.00017         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Ritu Rani

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Nishi Borgohain

DOI: 10.5958/2321-5828.2016.00019.X         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Hilal Ahmad Wani

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Melveen Abhishek

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (RJHSS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal, correspondence in the fields of arts, commerce and social sciences....... Read more >>>

RNI: Not Available                     
DOI: 10.5958/2321-5828 


Recent Articles




Tags