Author(s):
Maila Montemayor-Blanza
Email(s):
mmblanza@ust.edu.ph
DOI:
10.52711/2321-5828.2024.00052 
Address:
Maila Montemayor-Blanza
Associate Professor, University of Santo Tomas, Researcher, Center for Theology, Religious Studies, and Ethics, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 15,
Issue - 4,
Year - 2024
ABSTRACT:
This study revisits the Second Vatican Council of the Catholic Church decree Ad Gentes on the mission activity of the Church; it examines its relevance in the context of contemporary religious pluralism. The primary objective of this paper is to underscore the importance of recognizing religious pluralism as an undeniably global reality, particularly in a world marked by profound cultural differences. The impact of religious pluralism has drastically changed the landscape of mission and warrants a careful understanding of its dialogical relationship to the missionary activity of the Catholic Church and diverse religious traditions. This study furthers that mission must adapt to varied cultural and religious contexts. Since Vatican II, there has been a heightened emphasis on developing plural theologies. This research study advocates for a paradigm shift in mission, moving forward with a theocentric approach that better addresses the complexities of religious pluralism. Such an approach reshapes the Church’s mission and guides the formation of Christians in a world of diverse beliefs. The study concludes that a theologically grounded theocentric approach, starting with human experience and contextual realities, is essential for a meaningful dialogue and mission in a pluralistic world. This shift enriches the Church’s theological discourse and missionary endeavors.
Cite this article:
Maila Montemayor-Blanza. Towards a Theocentric Approach: Missio Ad Gentes in the Context of Religious Pluralism. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2024;15(4):329-4. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2024.00052
Cite(Electronic):
Maila Montemayor-Blanza. Towards a Theocentric Approach: Missio Ad Gentes in the Context of Religious Pluralism. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2024;15(4):329-4. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2024.00052 Available on: https://rjhssonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2024-15-4-14
REFERENCE:
1. Vladimir Latinovic, Gerard Mannion, and Peter C. Phan, eds., Pathways for Interreligious Dialogue in the Twenty-First Century (New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2016), 246.
2. Timothy C. Tennent, Invitation to World Missions: A Trinitarian Missiology for the Twenty-First Century (Kregel Academic, 2010).38
3. Ibid.68
4. John Tomlinson, Globalization and Culture (John Wiley & Sons, 2013).1
5. Hilal Ahmad Wani. Impact of Globalization on World Culture. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2(2): April-June, 2011, 33.
6. Edgar Javier, “Religious Pluriformity in God’s Global Community: Challenges and Prospects,” Logos Publications, Missio Inter Gentes, 1, no. 1 (January 2015).5
7. Demetrios J. Constantelos, The Greek Orthodox Church: Faith, History, and Practice (Seabury Press, 1967).
8. Catholic Church, Vatican II, Ad Gentes, no. 2.
9. Ibid.
10. Robert Audi, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd edition (Cambridge: University Press, 1999), 71.
11. Wilfred Cantwell Smith, Religious Diversity, (New York: Harper and Row, 1999).
12. Mahendra Kumar Premi, Ravindra Kumar Chapdi. “Issues of Religious Pluralism and Dialogue.” Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 5(1): January-March 2014, 73.
13. David Basinger, Religious Diversity (Pluralism) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2010
14. Joseph Runzo, “God, Commitment, and Other Faiths: Pluralism vs. Relativism,” Faith and Philosophy, 5 (1988): 343–364.
15. Felix Wilfred, “A New Way of Being Christians. Preparing to Encounter Neighbours of Other Faiths.”, 39-44.
16. Charles Edward Van Engen, Transforming Mission Theology (Pasadena, California: William Carey Library, 2017), 99.
17. Emil Brunner, The Word and the World (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1931), 108.
18. Diana L. Eck “The Pluralism Project 2006” Harvard University.
19. Vatican II, Ad Gentes.
20. National Catechetical Directory of the Philippines, 200
21. Vatican II, Gaudium et Spes, 22
22. Paul F. Knitter “Can we put our theological money where our dialogical mouth is? Looking back over the past fifty years.” Journal Of Ecumenical Studies 49 no. 1(Winter 2014): 168
23. Julia Sheetz-Willard, Per Faaland, Rebecca Mays, & Angela Ilic, “Interreligious Dialogue Reconsidered: Learning from and responding to Critique and Change.” Journal of Ecumenical Studies 47 no. 2 (Spring 2012): 258.
24. Ecclesiam Suam 9 Pope Paul VI 1964.
25. Jacques Dupuis SJ, Jacques. 1990. "Religious Plurality and the Christological Debate. Paper presented at conference on Dialogue with Living Faiths sponsored by World Council of Churches in Baar, Switzerland, January 9, 1990.
26. Glenn Ambrose. “Religious Diversity, Sacramental Encounters and the Spirit of God.” Horizons 37, no. 2 (2010):271-290
27. Anselm Min. “Loving without understanding: Raimon Pannikar’s ontological pluralism.” International Journal of Philosophy of Religion 68 (2010): 59-75
28. Ibid. 291.
29. Felix Wilfred, “A New Way of Being Christians. Preparing to Encounter Neighbours of Other Faiths.” 39-44.
30. Susan Smith. “Partial Transcendence, Religious Pluralism, and the Question of Love.” Harvard Theological Review 104, no.1 (2011):1-31.
31. Address of His Holiness The 14th Dalai Lama.
32. Veli-Matti Kärkkäinen, Pneumatology: The Holy Spirit in Ecumenical, International, and Contextual Perspective (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic, 2002), 9.
33. John Paul II, Redemptoris Missio, 26.
34. Francis, Apostolic Exhortation on the Proclamation of the Gospel in Today's World Evangelii Gaudium, The Joy of the Gospel, (24 November 2013), Acta Apostolicae Sedis 105 (2013), 117.