ABSTRACT:
Smart Classroom concept is a way of digital learning. From the beginning it was an imagination of the student. This type of classroom has digital equipped with a huge variety of teaching learning methods using technology. In these days many more classrooms are doing or using audio and visual components to a lesson. A smart classroom helps a teacher through technology as well. The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of smart classroom through statistical analysis. For study,10th grades students were selected. Teacher taught 10th grades student between two ways which were traditional way and other one smart teaching learning process. From this analysis getting that students are more interested to join smart class than traditional classes. The sample of the study comprised of 120 students of 10th grade students. The analysis was conducted the way of pre-test score and post test score of two groups. As a result smart classroom have more positive effect on education than traditional class.
Cite this article:
Gunjan Sharma, Banasree Pattanayak. A Study on Effectiveness of Smart Classrooms through Statistical Analysis. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2022;13(1):25-8. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2022.00005
Cite(Electronic):
Gunjan Sharma, Banasree Pattanayak. A Study on Effectiveness of Smart Classrooms through Statistical Analysis. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2022;13(1):25-8. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2022.00005 Available on: https://rjhssonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2022-13-1-5
REFERENCES:
1. Abica, J.C, and Valentine, C. (1991). Gender difference in creative achievement: A survey of exploration genetic. Social and General Psychology Monograph, 117(3), 63.
2. Adelman, H.S., and Taylor, L. (1997). Classroom Climate. In S.W. Lee, P.A. Lowe, and E. Robinson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of School Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Saga Publications.
3. Alessi, S. M, and Trollop S. R. (1985). Computer-based instruction: Methods and development. New Jersey : Prentice Hall.
4. Balanskat, A., and Blamire, R. (2007). ICT in schools:Trends, innovations and issues in 2006-2007. European Schoolnet. Retrieved December 15, 2008, from
5. http://insight.eun.org/ww/en/pub/insight/misc/specialreports/ict_in_schools_.htm
6. Chaudhary, V. (2004). A Comparative study of urban and rural high school boys and girls in relation to creativity. Indian Psychological Abstracts and Reviews, 11(2),17-19.
7. Gerber, S. (1996). Extracurricular activities and academic achievement. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20(1), 42-50.
8. Jordan, D. (2002). Smart Classrooms. Retrieved from http://profj.info/smartclassrooms.
9. Samuelsson, J. (2008). The impact of different teaching methods on students ‘arithmetic and self regulated learning skills. Educational Psychology in Practice: Theory, Research and Practice in Educational Psychology, 24(3), 237-250.
10. Trow (1960). Academic achievement. In Dandapani (Ed.), A Text Book of Advanced Education Psychology (pp. 384). New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers.
11. Young-Joo Jeon 2016, ‘How to Improve the Construction and Layout of Smart Classrooms for Teaching English’, International Journal of u- and e- Service, Science and Technology, vol.9, no.2, pp.41-48.
12. Zahra Taleb and Fatemeh Hassanzadeh 2015, ‘Toward Smart School: A Comparison between Smart School and Traditional School for Mathematics Learning’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol.171, pp. 90-95.